Tag Think Tanks

Venezuela: Breaking Democracy

The abduction of a sitting president, the seizure of oil tankers on the high seas, and the open violation of the UN Charter mark a historic rupture in international norms. Venezuela is not an isolated case—it is a blueprint. This article examines how power has replaced law, why the “rules-based order” no longer protects smaller states, and what this precedent means for global security in an emerging post-legal world order.

From RAND Study to National Security Strategy

The U.S. National Security Strategy of November 2025 pivots to the Pacific, declares Russia irrelevant, and effectively designates the EU as an adversary. What appears to be Trump's whim is the verbatim implementation of RAND studies from 2016 and 2017. America's most influential think tank war-gamed a conflict with China and defined a "window until 2035" for military superiority. Today, these recommendations appear word-for-word in official U.S. doctrine. RAND plans – Washington executes.

Venezuela: Escalation as Announced

The bombing of Caracas and the capture of President Maduro appear as a shocking escalation – yet they were planned in advance. US think tanks openly outlined the scenario years ago. Venezuela exposes how regime change, violations of international law, and military force are now exercised without disguise – and why the so-called rules-based order is collapsing.

Venezuela Intervention Part 2

Venezuela: Who Profits, Who Plans, Who Pays? To understand Venezuela, you have to follow the money.
Part 2 exposes the actors driving the escalation: defense contractors, energy giants, think tanks, exile networks, and political donors – complete with names, numbers, and documented influence mechanisms. This chapter dismantles the architecture of a system where interventions are not driven by security concerns but by profit, geopolitical leverage, and long-term strategic positioning. It reveals how Venezuela has become the convergence point of global power interests – and why the forces pushing for escalation are far stronger than any warnings against it.